1. K. Gopi vs DCIT (ITAT)
Mere furnishing of affidavit and confirmation letters from the
parties cannot itself prove the genuineness of the transaction as required u/s
68 of the IT Act.
2. DIT
vs. Prudential Assurance Company Ltd. (HC)
AAR Ruling - Binding Precedent- Subsequent advance ruling in
third-party case does not supersede advance ruling obtained by the assessee. Therefore, reopening of assessment was not justified because the
Authority for Advance Ruling’s finding in the assessee matter continued to
govern the assessee assessment.
3. Scott R. Bayman vs CIT (HC)
The renovation expenditures paid by the employer on
employer-provided accommodations are not taxed separately as income to the
employee when the employer had already included the value of the accommodations
in India in the employee’s taxable income.
No comments:
Post a Comment